Another example is that anyone can say anything (rating/reputation) about anyone('s identity) on the Internet.
It’s hard to distantiate yourself from things that are being said about you on the Internet, but they’re the first ones to pop up on Google. Sometimes it’s even impossible to make it undone, even if you can ‘delete’ the data on the platform where it was originally posted on, since it’ll probably be stored on there for eternity anyway.
The other option is getting the link removed from Google, which is called “the right to be forgotten”… What a joke that is. If anyone has downloaded it in the meanwhile, it’s probably still out there somewhere, so there’s definitely no way to guarantee you your rights on this one.
Anyway, as a result, during the 3rd month of 2015, Google has already processed copyright takedown requests for 100 million allegedly infringing links. I’ll let you decide for yourself whether that’s privacy protection or straight-out censorship. We’ll probably both agree on that it’s a reputation system and that it applies blacklisting; that it trusts all data until they decide for us that it’s ‘untrustworthy’ and throw it down the memory hole (as far as they’re able to). I believe that this is the direct result from their centralized business model, since it’s not built for decentralizing ownership of content, identity, reputation, and let alone money.
It’s also not hard to find examples in which people start downloading something once an anti-piracy organization steps in and starts trying to take it down. This also exemplifies how pointless blacklisting for reputation systems can be in these cases, when it is applied after the data has already influenced the network. Trust starts with whitelisting, just like in real life. With word of mouth we can transfer trust from person to person. Once we follow this approach, we can continue saying anything we want about anyone, only will we then also be able to distantiate ourselves from statements that we believe to be false, and we can then also finally decide who we’d want to listen to in the first place.
Combine this with the thought of centralized parties which store millions and even billions of copies of our sensitive identifiers, then them being hacked by God knows who, and it won’t be hard to find real-life examples of victims from: identity theft, reputation damage, even up to destroying whole lives (think of maybe the first and possibly most well known example: Monica Lewinsky).
Decentralized identity systems will allow us to authenticate ourselves in more privacy-friendly manners. Even without storing sensitive and private identifiers with parties we don’t know/trust, and without millions of copies of your sensitive identifiers stored everywhere around the world… Without you ever knowing where exactly.
What if you had a choice on where it was stored, how, and to be able to move it to another party (even before or) after the trust in the previous party has been lost? Personally, I prefer to choose who I do/don’t trust, share my data with, and who to listen to when asking for advice. I don’t need someone else figuring out what’s best for me. And in cases where I do, I still prefer to choose that party myself.
So, if you went to go look for a more censorship-resistant kind of system, such as a decentralized storage network like MaidSafe or StorJ, you’ll quickly find out that it’s very important to attach identities to the data, in order to make sure that what you create can also be destroyed by only yourself, and to let you decide who will store what about you. Once you’ll want to destroy this data, you’ll have to make sure that the associated identity and everything that’s linked to it (such as historical reputation data) is destroyed with it. When you store these identities with central parties however, that effect is gone and you’re back at square zero.
I’m really tired now, so sorry if I don’t make sense (anymore). I’ll re-read this tomorrow and will probably slap myself in the face then. Please feel free to ask me more questions in the meanwhile, and I’ll get back to you after catching some sleep.